Repucci, S. & Slipowitz, A. Freedom in the World 2022: The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule (Freedom House, 2022).
Choma, B. L. & Hanoch, Y. Cognitive ability and authoritarianism: understanding support for Trump and Clinton. Pers. Individ. Differ. 106, 287–291 (2017).
Federico, C. M. & de Zavala, A. G. Collective narcissism and the 2016 US presidential vote. Public Opin. Q. 82, 110–121 (2018).
Womick, J., Rothmund, T., Azevedo, F., King, L. A. & Jost, J. T. Group-based dominance and authoritarian aggression predict support for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 643–652 (2019).
Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Golec de Zavala, A., Guerra, R. & Simão, C. The relationship between the Brexit vote and individual predictors of prejudice: collective narcissism, right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation. Front. Psychol. 8, 1–14 (2017).
Van Assche, J., Dhont, K. & Pettigrew, T. F. The social-psychological bases of far-right support in Europe and the United States. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29, 385–401 (2019).
Moghaddam, F. M. Threat to Democracy: The Appeal of Authoritarianism in an Age of Uncertainty (American Psychological Association, 2019).
Dunwoody, P. T. & Plane, D. L. The influence of authoritarianism and outgroup threat on political affiliations and support for antidemocratic policies. Peace Conflict J. Peace Psychol. 25, 198–210 (2019).
Cohrs, J. C., Kämpfe-Hargrave, N. & Riemann, R. Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: evidence from peer-report data. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 103, 343–361 (2012). This paper shows that peer reports of people’s personalities can predict individual differences in right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.
Cichocka, A., Dhont, K. & Makwana, A. P. On self-love and outgroup hate: opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Eur. J. Personal. 31, 366–384 (2017).
Peitz, L., Dhont, K. & Seyd, B. The psychology of supranationalism: its ideological correlates and implications for EU attitudes and post-Brexit preferences. Polit. Psychol. 39, 1305–1322 (2018).
Hartman, T. K. et al. The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic: effects on nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 12, 1274–1285 (2021).
Osborne, D., Satherley, N., Little, T. D. & Sibley, C. G. Authoritarianism and social dominance predict annual increases in generalized prejudice. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 12, 1136–1145 (2021). This paper uses ten annual waves of longitudinal data to demonstrate that right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict annual within-person increases in prejudice.
Feldman, S. in At the Forefront of Political Psychology: Essays in Honor of John L. Sullivan Ch. 3 (eds Borgida, E., Federico, C. M. & Miller, J. M.) 35–54 (Routledge, 2020).
Napier, J. L. & Jost, J. T. The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: a cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. J. Soc. Issues 64, 595–617 (2008).
Altemeyer, B. The Authoritarian Specter (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
Altemeyer, B. Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism 1st edn (Jossey-Bass, 1988).
Mavor, K. I., Louis, W. R. & Sibley, C. G. A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: support for a three-factor structure. Personal. Individ. Differ. 48, 28–33 (2010).
Feldman, S. Enforcing social conformity: a theory of authoritarianism. Polit. Psychol. 24, 41–74 (2003). This paper provides an important counterpoint to the ideologically based view of (right-wing) authoritarianism by suggesting that an extreme preference for social conformity over personal autonomy forms the core of authoritarian views.
Nilsson, A. & Jost, J. T. The authoritarian–conservatism nexus. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 148–154 (2020).
Costello, T. H. et al. Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 122, 135–170 (2022). This paper provides the most conclusive evidence to date that left-wing authoritarianism exists and presents an accompanying individual difference measure.
Duckitt, J. in Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology Ch. 11 (eds Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G.) 177–197 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Conway, L. G. III & McFarland, J. D. Do right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism predict election outcomes?: Support for Obama and Trump across two United States presidential elections. Personal. Individ. Differ. 138, 84–87 (2019).
Conway, L. G. III, Houck, S. C., Gornick, L. J. & Repke, M. A. Finding the loch ness monster: left-wing authoritarianism in the United States. Polit. Psychol. 39, 1049–1067 (2018).
Van Hiel, A., Duriez, B. & Kossowska, M. The presence of left-wing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship with conservative ideology. Polit. Psychol. 27, 769–793 (2006).
Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. in The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (eds Chris G. S. & Fiona K. B.) 188–221 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).
Ho, A. K. et al. The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 109, 1003–1028 (2015).
Thomsen, L., Green, E. G. T. & Sidanius, J. We will hunt them down: how social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 1455–1464 (2008).
Crowson, H. M. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as mediators of worldview beliefs on attitudes related to the war on terror. Soc. Psychol. 40, 93–103 (2009).
Duckitt, J. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 33 Ch. 2 (ed. Zanna, M. P.) 41–113 (Academic, 2001). This paper provides the theoretical foundations of the dual process motivational model, laying the groundwork for subsequent work examining the causes and consequences of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.
Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I. & Roets, A. The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five‐factor model of personality and social attitudes. Eur. J. Personal. 21, 131–148 (2007).
Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L. & Miller, J. D. Differences among dark triad components: a meta-analytic investigation. Personal. Disord. 9, 101–111 (2018).
Duckitt, J. & Fisher, K. The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Polit. Psychol. 24, 199–222 (2003).
Perry, R., Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. Dangerous and competitive worldviews: a meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. J. Res. Personal. 47, 116–127 (2013).
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. & Duckitt, J. Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five-month period. Polit. Psychol. 28, 357–371 (2007).
Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: a longitudinal test during a global recession. J. Soc. Psychol. 153, 448–466 (2013).
Osborne, D., Lilly, K. J., Huang, Y. & Sibley, C. G. Community-level diversity decreases right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation by alleviating dangerous and competitive worldviews: multilevel and longitudinal tests of the dual process model. N. Z. J. Psychol. (in the press).
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y. & Malka, A. Reconsidering the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 115, 1482–1498 (2021).
Onraet, E., Dhont, K. & Van Hiel, A. The relationships between internal and external threats and right-wing attitudes: a three-wave longitudinal study. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 712–725 (2014).
Sidanius, J. et al. You’re inferior and not worth our concern: the interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. J. Personal. 81, 313–323 (2013).
de Vries, R. E., Wesseldijk, L. W., Karinen, A. K., Jern, P. & Tybur, J. M. Relations between HEXACO personality and ideology variables are mostly genetic in nature. Eur. J. Personal. 36, 200–217 (2022).
Osborne, D., Satherley, N. & Sibley, C. G. in Oxford Handbook on Behavioral Political Science Ch. 14 (eds Mintz, A. & Terris, L.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2023).
Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. Does openness to experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology. J. Res. Personal. 87, 103979 (2020).
Bouchard, T. J. & Johnson, W. Keith Hayes’ experience-producing drives: an appreciation and extension. Personal. Individ. Differ. 169, 110082 (2021).
Dweck, C. S. From needs to goals and representations: foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychol. Rev. 124, 689–719 (2017).
Claessens, S., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G. & Atkinson, Q. D. in Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology Ch. 2 (eds Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G.) 22–36 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G. & Atkinson, Q. D. The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 336–345 (2020).
Kandler, C., Bell, E. & Riemann, R. The structure and sources of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Eur. J. Personal. 30, 406–420 (2016).
Ludeke, S., Johnson, W. & Bouchard, T. J. “Obedience to traditional authority:” a heritable factor underlying authoritarianism, conservatism and religiousness. Personal. Individ. Differ. 55, 375–380 (2013).
Lewis, G. J. & Bates, T. C. Common heritable effects underpin concerns over norm maintenance and in-group favoritism: evidence from genetic analyses of right-wing authoritarianism and traditionalism. J. Personal. 82, 297–309 (2014).
Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E. & Herrmann, E. Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: the interdependence hypothesis. Curr. Anthropol. 53, 673–692 (2012).
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation. J. Personal. 58, 17–67 (1990).
Crawford, C. B. & Anderson, J. L. Sociobiology: an environmentalist discipline. Am. Psychol. 44, 1449–1459 (1989).
Buss, D. M. How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 359–366 (2009).
Wolf, M. & McNamara, J. M. On the evolution of personalities via frequency-dependent selection. Am. Nat. 179, 679–692 (2012).
Wilson, D. S. Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 353, 199–205 (1998).
Nettle, D. The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. Am. Psychol. 61, 622–631 (2006).
Van Doorn, G. S., Weissing, F. & Hengeveld, G. The evolution of social dominance II: multi-player models. Behaviour 140, 1333–1358 (2003).
Van Doorn, G. S., Geerten, M. H. & Weissing, F. J. The evolution of social dominance I: two-player models. Behaviour 140, 1305–1332 (2003).
Dall, S. R. X., Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol. Lett. 7, 734–739 (2004).
Gross, M. R., Harvey, P. H., Partridge, L. & Southwood, S. R. Evolution of alternative reproductive strategies: frequency-dependent sexual selection in male bluegill sunfish. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 332, 59–66 (1991).
Sibley, C. G. et al. Profiling authoritarian leaders and followers: a model of social dominators and right-wing authoritarians. TPM Test. Psychom. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 26, 401–417 (2019).
Penke, L. in The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences Ch. 9 (eds Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H.) 243–279 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Penke, L. & Jokela, M. The evolutionary genetics of personality revisited. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 7, 104–109 (2016).
Briley, D. A. & Tucker-Drob, E. M. Comparing the developmental genetics of cognition and personality over the life span. J. Personal. 85, 51–64 (2017).
Zubielevitch, E., Osborne, D., Milojev, P. & Sibley, C. G. Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism across the adult lifespan: an examination of aging and cohort effects. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 124, 544-566 (2023). This paper examines the development of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation across the adult lifespan and demonstrates that right-wing authoritarianism is more sensitive than social dominance orientation to contextual factors.
Zubielevitch, E., Cheung, G. W., Sengupta, N. K., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. People and the place: social dominance orientation is reciprocally associated with hierarchy-enhancing occupations over time. J. Manag. 48, 1243–1269 (2022).
Haley, H. & Sidanius, J. Person–organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: a social dominance perspective. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 8, 187–203 (2005).
Lepage, J. et al. Authoritarian attitudes are associated with higher autonomic reactivity to stress and lower recovery. Emotion 22, 526–544 (2022). This paper demonstrates that authoritarianism correlates positively with how strongly people’s autonomic system reacts to stress.
Liuzza, M. T. et al. Body odour disgust sensitivity predicts authoritarian attitudes. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171091 (2018).
Wu, B.-P. & Chang, L. The social impact of pathogen threat: how disease salience influences conformity. Personal. Individ. Differ. 53, 50–54 (2012).
McCourt, K., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A. & Keyes, M. Authoritarianism revisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personal. Individ. Differ. 27, 985–1014 (1999).
Polderman, T. J. C. et al. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 702–709 (2015).
Eaves, L. et al. Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2, 62–80 (1999).
Truett, K. R., Eaves, L. J., Meyer, J. M., Heath, A. C. & Martin, N. G. Religion and education as mediators of attitudes: a multivariate analysis. Behav. Genet. 22, 43–62 (1992).
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality Vol. 1 (Wiley, 1950).
Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M. & Duriez, B. The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30, 824–837 (2004).
Berggren, M., Akrami, N., Bergh, R. & Ekehammar, B. Motivated social cognition and authoritarianism: is it all about closed-mindedness? J. Individ. Differ. 40, 204–212 (2019).
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J. & Robbins, T. W. Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4532–E4540 (2018).
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 129, 339–375 (2003). This paper identifies the motivational components of ideology and lays the foundations for understanding the central and enduring features of conservatism.
Hodson, G. & Busseri, M. A. Bright minds and dark attitudes: lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychol. Sci. 23, 187–195 (2012).
Zmigrod, L., Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Robbins, T. W. & Poldrack, R. A. The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: a data-driven approach. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 376, 20200424 (2021). This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the cognitive underpinnings of ideology (including authoritarianism and social dominance orientation) using an impressive battery of behaviorally based measures of cognitive processing skills.
Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. in Perspectives on Authoritarianism Ch. 11 (eds Funke, F., Petzel, T., Cohrs, J. C. & Duckitt, J.) 169–199 (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2016).
Perry, R. & Sibley, C. G. Big-five personality prospectively predicts social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 52, 3–8 (2012).
Desimoni, M. & Leone, L. Openness to experience, honesty–humility and ideological attitudes: a fine-grained analysis. Personal. Individ. Differ. 59, 116–119 (2014).
Stenner, K. The Authoritarian Dynamic (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Dhont, K. & Pattyn, S. Internal and external threat in relationship with right-wing attitudes. J. Personal. 81, 233–248 (2013).
Onraet, E., van Hiel, A. & Cornelis, I. Threat and right-wing attitudes: a cross-national approach. Polit. Psychol. 34, 791–803 (2013).
Mirisola, A., Roccato, M., Russo, S., Spagna, G. & Vieno, A. Societal threat to safety, compensatory control, and right-wing authoritarianism. Polit. Psychol. 35, 795–812 (2014).
Echebarria-Echabe, A. & Fernández-Guede, E. Effects of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 36, 259–265 (2006).
Fritsche, I., Cohrs, J. C., Kessler, T. & Bauer, J. Global warming is breeding social conflict: the subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies. J. Environ. Psychol. 32, 1–10 (2012).
Asbrock, F. & Fritsche, I. Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: who is being threatened, the Me or the We? Int. J. Psychol. 48, 35–49 (2013).
Golec de Zavala, A., Bierwiaczonek, K., Baran, T., Keenan, O. & Hase, A. The COVID-19 pandemic, authoritarianism, and rejection of sexual dissenters in Poland. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers. 8, 250–260 (2021).
Morrison, K. R. & Ybarra, O. The effects of realistic threat and group identification on social dominance orientation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 156–163 (2008).
Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M. & Zakrisson, I. What matters most to prejudice: big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? Eur. J. Personal. 18, 463–482 (2004).
Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B. & Bergh, R. Generalized prejudice: common and specific components. Psychol. Sci. 22, 57–59 (2011).
Altemeyer, B. The other “authoritarian personality”. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30, 47–92 (1998).
Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: a longitudinal test. Eur. J. Personal. 24, 324–340 (2010).
Bratt, C., Sidanius, J. & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. Shaping the development of prejudice: latent growth modeling of the influence of social dominance orientation on outgroup affect in youth. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42, 1617–1634 (2016).
Haase, A., Asbrock, F. & Rohmann, A. Right-wing authoritarianism and majority members’ preferences for minority acculturation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 50, 827–838 (2020).
Crawford, J. T. & Brandt, M. J. Ideological (a)symmetries in prejudice and intergroup bias. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 40–45 (2020).
Stern, C. & Crawford, J. T. Ideological conflict and prejudice: an adversarial collaboration examining correlates and ideological (a)symmetries. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 12, 42–53 (2021).
Brandt, M. J. & Crawford, J. T. Worldview conflict and prejudice. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 61, 1–66 (2020).
Hodson, G. Pushing back against the microaggression pushback in academic psychology: reflections on a concept–creep paradox. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 932–955 (2021).
Badaan, V. & Jost, J. T. Conceptual, empirical, and practical problems with the claim that intolerance, prejudice, and discrimination are equivalent on the political left and right. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 229–238 (2020).
Baron, J. & Jost, J. T. False equivalence: are liberals and conservatives in the United States equally biased. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 292–303 (2019).
Bergh, R., Akrami, N., Sidanius, J. & Sibley, C. G. Is group membership necessary for understanding generalized prejudice? A re-evaluation of why prejudices are interrelated. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 111, 367–395 (2016).
Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. Eur. J. Personal. 21, 113–130 (2007).
Cantal, C., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S. & Gouveia, V. V. Differential effects of right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. Eur. J. Personal. 29, 17–27 (2015).
Roets, A., Van Hiel, A. & Dhont, K. Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men’s and women’s sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. Eur. J. Personal. 26, 350–359 (2012).
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. & Duckitt, J. Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: the dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 160–172 (2007).
Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. Right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially moderate intergroup effects on prejudice. Eur. J. Personal. 24, 583–601 (2010).
Sibley, C. G. et al. A dual process model of attitudes towards immigration: person × residential area effects in a national sample. Polit. Psychol. 34, 553–572 (2013).
Duckitt, J. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 684–696 (2006).
Levin, S., Pratto, F., Matthews, M., Sidanius, J. & Kteily, N. A dual process approach to understanding prejudice toward Americans in Lebanon: an extension to intergroup threat perceptions and emotions. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 16, 139–158 (2012).
Craig, M. A. & Richeson, J. A. Not in my backyard! Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and support for strict immigration policies at home and abroad. Polit. Psychol. 35, 417–429 (2014).
Mathew, S. & Boyd, R. Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11375–11380 (2011).
Clemens, V. et al. Authoritarianism and the transgenerational transmission of corporal punishment. Child. Abuse Negl. 106, 104537 (2020).
Depauw, H., Van Hiel, A. & Dierckx, K. The relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and aggression in everyday life. Personal. Individ. Differ. 186, 111333 (2022).
Van Hiel, A. et al. A meta-analytic integration of research on the relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and aggressive tendencies. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 31, 183–221 (2020). This paper presents a meta-analysis of the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and interpersonal aggression.
Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S. & Pratto, F. Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Polit. Psychol. 26, 569–584 (2005).
Hetherington, M. & Suhay, E. Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the War on Terror. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55, 546–560 (2011).
McFarland, S. G. On the eve of war: authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students’ attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31, 360–367 (2005).
Lindén, M., Björklund, F. & Bäckström, M. How a terror attack affects right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and their relationship to torture attitudes. Scand. J. Psychol. 59, 547–552 (2018).
Krause, K. Authoritarianism, social dominance, and contesting human rights in Latin America. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 55, 254–265 (2020).
Cohrs, J. C., Maes, J., Moschner, B. & Kielmann, S. Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior: a comparison and integration of psychological perspectives. Polit. Psychol. 28, 441–469 (2007).
Kossowska, M. et al. Relationships between right-wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: a comparison among four European countries. Br. J. Psychol. 102, 245–259 (2011).
McFarland, S. & Mathews, M. Who cares about human rights. Polit. Psychol. 26, 365–385 (2005).
Faragó, L., Kende, A. & Krekó, P. Justification of intergroup violence — the role of right-wing authoritarianism and propensity for radical action. Dyn. Asymmetric Confl. 12, 113–128 (2019).
Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D. & Hunt, C. Mapping the connections between politics and morality: the multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Polit. Psychol. 34, 589–610 (2013).
Milojev, P. et al. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict different moral signatures. Soc. Justice Res. 27, 149–174 (2014).
Kugler, M., Jost, J. T. & Noorbaloochi, S. Another look at moral foundations theory: do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Soc. Justice Res. 27, 413–431 (2014).
Vargas-Salfate, S., Liu, J. H. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. Right-wing authoritarianism and national identification: the role of democratic context. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 32, 318–331 (2020). This paper provides a clear test of the impact of country-level variables on the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and national identification.
Satherley, N., Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. Ideology before party: social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism temporally precede political party support. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 60, 509–523 (2021).
Osborne, D., Milojev, P. & Sibley, C. G. Authoritarianism and national identity: examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 43, 1086–1099 (2017).
Tilley, B. P. When trauma isn’t traumatic enough: authoritarianism, sex, and religion influence agreement with Alabama’s HB 314 restrictions on traumatic abortion. Soc. Sci. J., 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949546 (in the press).
Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., Crowson, H. M. & Roets, A. The relationship between right‐wing attitudes and cognitive style: a comparison of self‐report and behavioural measures of rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity. Eur. J. Personal. 30, 523–531 (2016).
Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A. & Cornelis, I. The closed mind: ‘experience’ and ‘cognition’ aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right‐wing attitudes. Eur. J. Personal. 25, 184–197 (2011).
De keersmaecker, J. & Roets, A. Is there an ideological asymmetry in the moral approval of spreading misinformation by politicians? Personal. Individ. Differ. 143, 165–169 (2019).
Sinclair, A. H., Stanley, M. L. & Seli, P. Closed-minded cognition: right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 27, 1348–1361 (2020).
Richey, S. A birther and a truther: the influence of the authoritarian personality on conspiracy beliefs. Polit. Policy 45, 465–485 (2017).
Wood, M. J. & Gray, D. Right-wing authoritarianism as a predictor of pro-establishment versus anti-establishment conspiracy theories. Personal. Individ. Differ. 138, 163–166 (2019).
Stanley, S. K. & Wilson, M. S. Meta-analysing the association between social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and attitudes on the environment and climate change. J. Environ. Psychol. 61, 46–56 (2019). This paper provides a meta-analysis of the associations right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation have with environmental attitudes.
Milfont, T., Satherley, N., Osborne, D., Wilson, M. S. & Sibley, C. G. To meat, or not to meat: a longitudinal investigation of transitioning to and from plant-based diets. Appetite 166, 105584 (2021).
Kerr, J. R. & Wilson, M. S. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 24, 550–567 (2021).
Azevedo, F. & Jost, J. T. The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 24, 518–549 (2021).
Stanley, S. K., Wilson, M. S. & Milfont, T. L. Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 108, 174–177 (2017).
Stanley, S. K., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S. & Sibley, C. G. The influence of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on environmentalism: a five-year cross-lagged analysis. PLoS ONE 14, e0219067 (2019).
Gleason, A. Totalitarianism: The Inner History of the Cold War (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).
Rokeach, M. The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems (Basic Books, 1960).
McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S. & Abalakina-Paap, M. A. Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 63, 1004–1010 (1992).
de Regt, S., Mortelmans, D. & Smits, T. Left-wing authoritarianism is not a myth, but a worrisome reality. Evidence from 13 Eastern European countries. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 44, 299–308 (2011).
Federico, C. M. & Malka, A. The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: evidence and implications. Adv. Polit. Psychol. 39, 3–48 (2018). This paper identifies important nuances in the epistemic and existential correlates of (right-wing) political preferences, with particular attention to issue domain and the larger socio-political context.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. Exceptions that prove the rule — using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychol. Bull. 129, 383–393 (2003).
Costello, T. H. & Patrick, C. J. Development and initial validation of two brief measures of left-wing authoritarianism: a machine learning approach. J. Personal. Assess. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tz2py (2021).
Kempthorne, J. C. & Terrizzi, J. A. The behavioral immune system and conservatism as predictors of disease-avoidant attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personal. Individ. Differ. 178, 110857 (2021).
Manson, J. H. Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 167, 110251 (2020).
Peng, Y. Politics of COVID-19 vaccine mandates: left/right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and libertarianism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 194, 111661 (2022).
Cornelis, I. & Van Hiel, A. The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28, 37–50 (2006).
Johnston, C. D. Authoritarianism, affective polarization, and economic ideology. Adv. Polit. Psychol. 39, 219–238 (2018).
Dunwoody, P. T. & Funke, F. The aggression–submission–conventionalism scale: testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. J. Soc. Polit. Psychol. 4, 571–600 (2016).
Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. Identifying “types” of ideologies and intergroup biases: advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 28, 288–332 (2017).
Kessler, T. & Cohrs, J. C. The evolution of authoritarian processes: fostering cooperation in large-scale groups. Group Dyn. Theor. Res. Pract. 12, 73–84 (2008). This article was one of the first to suggest that authoritarianism could foster positive societal outcomes.
Vilanova, F., Milfont, T. L. & Costa, A. B. A dual process social psychological model of corrupt intention and attitudes toward corrupt people. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 123, 854–883 (2022).
Roets, A., Au, E. W. M. & Van Hiel, A. Can authoritarianism lead to greater liking of out-groups? The intriguing case of Singapore. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1972–1974 (2015).
Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Marchlewska, M. & Winiewski, M. When authoritarians confront prejudice. Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate‐speech prohibition. Polit. Psychol. 38, 87–99 (2017). This paper demonstrates that right-wing authoritarianism can be used to oppose hate speech in contexts where the expression of social biases is counter-normative.
Górska, P. et al. Authoritarians go with the flow: social norms moderate the link between right-wing authoritarianism and outgroup-directed attitudes. Polit. Psychol. 43, 131–152 (2022).
Reese, G. When authoritarians protect the earth — authoritarian submission and proenvironmental beliefs: a pilot study in Germany. Ecopsychology 4, 232–236 (2012).
Clarke, E. J. R., Klas, A. & Dyos, E. The role of ideological attitudes in responses to COVID-19 threat and government restrictions in Australia. Personal. Individ. Differ. 175, 110734 (2021).
Passini, S. Songs and flags: concern for COVID-19 and submission to authority. Personal. Individ. Differ. 185, 111251 (2022).
Bilewicz, M. & Soral, W. The politics of vaccine hesitancy: an ideological dual-process approach. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 1080–1089 (2022).
Huang, Y., Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. The gradual move toward gender equality: a 7-year latent growth model of ambivalent sexism. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 335–344 (2019).
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A. & O’Brien, L. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 82, 359–378 (2002).
Crandall, C. S., Miller, J. M. & White, M. H. Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. presidential election: the Trump effect on prejudice. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 9, 186–192 (2018).